The
overall assessment of the projected climate change for North America by the IPCC,
states specifically that the entire continent of North America is "very likely to warm during this century, and the annual mean
warming is likely to exceed the global mean warming in most areas. In northern
regions, warming is likely to be largest in winter, and in the southwest USA
largest in summer. The lowest winter temperatures are likely to increase more
than the average winter temperature in northern North America, and the highest
summer temperatures are likely to increase more than the average summer
temperature in the southwest USA." (IPCC,
2013). The part that I found most
interesting was that most of the warming in the northern parts like Canada will
increase more during the winter than in the summer. I actually thought it would be the exact
opposite. The key factors of why this is
happening is stated in section 11.5.1, where it says that "Central and northern regions of North
America are under the influence of mid-latitude cyclones. Projections by AOGCMs
(Chapter
10)
generally indicate a slight poleward shift in storm tracks, an increase in the
number of strong cyclones but a reduction in medium-strength cyclones over
Canada and poleward of 70°N. Consequent with the projected warming, the
atmospheric moisture transport and convergence is projected to increase,
resulting in a widespread increase in annual precipitation over most of the
continent except the south and south-western part of the USA and over Mexico" (IPCC,
2013). This shows that the overall
precipitation will increase as well.
Thus with increased temperatures and precipitation will happen mainly in
the upper northern regions of North America, like Canada. The middle region, or America, will have the
opposite reactions but seem to be in harmony with the Keeling Curve. Just like
the Keeling Curve suggests the entire continent of North America (along with
the entire globe) will experience a clear and evident warming.
The
IPCC's report on Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability show
some extremely disheartening information with regards to North America as a
continent. It states that "Warming in western mountains is projected
to cause decreased snowpack, more winter flooding, and reduced summer flows,
exacerbating competition for over-allocated water resources. *** D [14.4, B14.2]. Disturbances from pests, diseases and fire
are projected to have increasing impacts on forests, with an extended period of
high fire risk and large increases in area burned. *** N [14.4, B14.1]. Moderate climate change in the early decades
of the century is projected to increase aggregate yields of rain-fed
agriculture by 5-20%, but with important variability among regions. Major
challenges are projected for crops that are near the warm end of their suitable
range or which depend on highly utilised water resources. ** D [14.4]" (IPCC, 2013).
In Colorado, which is a very
mountainous region, we are already experiencing abnormal wild-fires that seem
to be uncontrollable. As well as the insect problem mentioned in the above
quote. It only makes since that the
increased heat caused a "decreased snowpack" and is exhausting our
natural water resources. This link http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/52291488/#52291488
will take you to a video on NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams, which is in
perfect harmony with the information collected by the IPCC. One of NBC's reporters stated that the
extreme wildfires in the U.S. are also experiencing "too many insects and
not enough water" (NBC, 2013). Apparently, the wildfires now have spread
to over six western states! It was also stated that in Canada they are
experiencing historic flooding and rain. I wondered if this also has to do with
the decreased snowpack, and it seems that it does, along with several problems
in our Polar region. The IPCC report
states that "In the Polar Regions, the main
projected biophysical effects are reductions in thickness and extent of
glaciers and ice sheets, and changes in natural ecosystems with detrimental
effects on many organisms including migratory birds, mammals and higher
predators. In the Arctic, additional impacts include reductions in the extent
of sea ice and permafrost, increased coastal erosion, and an increase in the
depth of permafrost seasonal thawing. ** D [15.3, 15.4, 15.2] (IPCC,
2013). So, overall it looks like it is the result of too much heat; which is
causing a cyclical effect causing everything in our polar regions to melt
slowly. Many cities like Calgary have
been declared a disaster zone and evacuation is mandatory. This is quite surprising because I have not
heard about the massive floods in Canada until creating this blog. This could be in part because the U.S. lame
stream media decided to take global warming off of their main agenda, as it
would eventually affect the profits of their major shareholders' oil reliant companies.
The
Executive Summary for North America by the IPCC explains the overall situation
of climate change for the entire continent.
The Summary made a very profound statement when it mentioned that “‘Mainstreaming’
climate change issues into decision making are a key prerequisite for
sustainability". Personally, I
believe this is the biggest threat to the overall continent because the
policies that Canada, America, and South America operate by cause a perpetual
system of environmental destruction. The
policies used to back the oil based companies are so detrimental to our future generations
that if there are not immediate changes implemented to find alternative sources
of energy the damage will be non-repairable, as it already is. The visual image that comes to mind is the
Melting Permafrost Feedback chart, as well as the Ice Albedo Feedback chart
from Module 1, section 5. These two
climate feedbacks will have a significant role in the overall climate
change of Canada, along with prehistoric policies; the melting permafrost seems
to post the biggest threat to Canada's climate.
The slide above shows the cycle of increased temperature causes the permafrost to melt, thus
causing methane to be released and atmospheric concentrations increase, which
then enhance the overall greenhouse effect.
This is what is known as a positive feedback, but will have an extremely
negative outcome for Canada. Just like
in Colorado, as large glaciers (or permafrost) melts it will cause the flooding
we now see in Canada, not to mention the increased greenhouse gas effect that
is not the positive greenhouse gas effect.
However, based on research found at the National Science Foundations
website (www.nsf.gov), it
seems that sea level rise will significantly impact Canada and North America as
a whole more than other continents due to the melting ice sheet in
Greenland. The NSF stated this in an
article published in May of 2009 "The melting of the
Greenland Ice Sheet this century may drive more water than previously thought
toward the already threatened coastlines of New York, Boston, Halifax and other
cities in the northeastern United States and Canada, according to new
research." They go on
to say "A study in Nature Geoscience in March
warned that warmer water temperatures could shift ocean currents in a way that
would raise sea levels off the Northeast by about 20 centimeters (8 inches)
more than the average global sea level rise that is expected with global
warming. But it did not include the additional impact of Greenland ice, which
at moderate to high melt rates would further accelerate changes in ocean
circulation and drive an additional 10 to 30 centimeters (4 to 12 inches)
of water toward northeastern North America on top of the average global
rise." (NSF,
2009).
Four to Twelve inches of water will definitely
prove to be one of the most serious problem's North America will have to
contend with. The NSF also points out
how this rise in sea level will affect the northward Atlantic conveyor belt “The
northeast coast of North America is especially vulnerable to the effects of
Greenland ice melt because of the way the meridional overturning circulation
acts like a conveyer belt transporting water through the Atlantic Ocean. The
circulation carries warm Atlantic water from the tropics to the north, where it
cools and descends to create a dense layer of cold water. As a result, sea
level is currently about 71 centimeters (28 inches) lower in the North
Atlantic than the North Pacific, which lacks such a dense layer. If the melting
of the Greenland Ice Sheet were to increase by 3 percent or 7 percent yearly,
the additional fresh water could partially disrupt the northward conveyor belt.
This would reduce the accumulation of deep, dense water. Instead, the deep
water would be slightly warmer, expanding and elevating the surface across
portions of the north Atlantic."(NSF, 2009). This is eerily similar to the Younger Dryas
period mentioned in Module 4. The large
concentration of freshwater caused a weak thermohaline circulation that completely
stopped the ocean circulation casing a rapid cooling like the professor
mentioned in the movie "The Day After Tomorrow" minus the Hollywood
added Tsunami. I see the connection here
and I sincerely hope that the melting of Greenland does not cause a ice age
type cooling like the Younger Dryas.
Although with all this increased warmth, I wonder if this rapid cooling
would somehow create some sort of counter balance. I am not sure how that would work, but it
seems extremely daunting to say the least.
References:
·
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, IPCC. (2013). Executive Summary; IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate
Change 2007: Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch14s14-es.html>
·
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, IPCC. (2013). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007:
Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Retrieved from <http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/spm.html>
·
NBC Network. (2013, June 23), NBC
Nightly News with Brian Williams [Television series]. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/52291488/#52291488
·
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, IPCC. (2013). IPCC Fourth
Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: Working Group I: The Physical Science
Basis. (Sections 11.5.1, 11.5.2, 11.5.3) Retrieved from <http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch11s11-5.html>
·
National Science Foundation, NSF.
(2009). Press Release 09-110: Sea-level
Rise May Pose Greatest Threat to Northeast U.S., Canada. Retrieved from
<http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=114871>
Wow! You bring up some very interesting problems that Canada will have to face. Your blog is out together well and is very informative. Thanks for the cool links.
ReplyDeleteI expected there to be an overall increase in temperatures, like most other places, but I was surprised to see that Canada would see one of the greatest increases. I also found "The lowest winter temperatures are likely to increase more than the average winter temperature in northern North America," interesting. That is quite a big jump in temperature differences.
ReplyDeleteWell, I can certainly attest to the increased pests problem! Living three stories up, I never get bugs. This Summer has seen one beetle after another after another, however. I didn't connect my pesky beetles with climate change until seeing this report, and now wonder if that is very much the case!
ReplyDeleteGreat blog-- very well written!